Register  |  Login  |  Inquiries  |  Sitemap |  
Advanced Search
Journal of Economic Integration 2013 March;28(1) :144-182.
ASEAN-New Zealand Trade Relations and Trade Potential: Evidence and Analysis

Sayeeda Bano Yoshiaki Takahashi Frank Scrimgeour 

The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan
Corresponding Author: Sayeeda Bano ,Tel: +64 7 8384931, Fax: +64 7 8384331, Email:
Copyright ©2013 Journal of Economic Integration
This study examines the development of trade between ASEAN and New Zealand. Indices of trade intensity and trade potential are used to analyse the intensity of existing trade for the period 1980~2010 and trade potential going forward. This is the first use of the trade potential method to assess the trade potential between New Zealand and ASEAN across industries. The results show significant potential for future growth in specific export sectors and demonstrate changing trade patterns between New Zealand and ASEAN members. Our findings also show that New Zealand-ASEAN trade has intensified over the years, even if it has been marked by fluctuations. This study also highlights development of Australian trade with ASEAN in the context of the ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand FTA. Our findings have implications for the integration of ASEAN with Australia and New Zealand.

JEL Classification
F10: General
F02: International Economic Order
F13: Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
F14: Empirical Studies of Trade
F15: Economic Integration
E63: Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy; Stabilization; Treasury Policy
Keywords: International Trade | Economic Integration | Trade Intensity | Trade Potential | ASEAN | Australia | New Zealand | FTA | CER | CEP | TPP | AANZFTA
1. ASEAN Secretariat. (2002). Joint media statement on the signing of the agreement establishing the ASEANAustralia-New Zealand free trade area. Retrieved from
2. ASEAN Secretariat. (2008). ASEAN CEPT commitments. Retrieved from
3. ASEAN Secretariat. (2009). ASEAN CEPT commitments. Retrieved from
4. ASEAN Secretariat. (2011). Southeast Asia - A free trade area. Retrieved from
5. ASEAN Secretariat.(2012). ASEAN Statistical Yearbook. Retrieved from
6. ASEAN Secretariat.(Various Years)ASEAN Statistical Yearbook. Retrieved from Assem, R. A. H., Nada, A., Shoumann, and Huo, X. (2012) Exploring Egypt-China bilateral trade: dynamics and prospects. Journal of Economic Studies. Vol. 39 Iss: 3, pp.314 - 326
7. Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2011, various years). Australia’s trade with East Asia. Retrieved from pubs
8. Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.(2007). Australia’s trade with ASEAN. Retrieved from
9. Bandara, J. S., & Smith, C. (2002). Trade Policy Reforms in South Asia and Australia-South Asia Trade: Intensities and Complementarities. South Asia Economic Journal, 3(2), 177-199.
10. Bano, S. and Sandrey R. (2003). Bilateral Trade Relations between New Zealand-Australia and Selected Asia- Pacific Nations. Published by NZ Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) Wellington, New Zealand
11. Bano, S. (2002). Intra-industry international trade and trade intensities: Evidence from New Zealand (Working Paper 5/02). New Zealand: The University of Waikato.
12. Bano, S. (2010). ASEAN-New Zealand Trade Relations and Trade Potential, Department of Economics, Working Paper in Economics 01/10 April 2010. The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, 3240
13. Chandran, S. (2011). Trade Complementarity and Similarity between India and ASEAN Countries in the Context of the RTA. Retrieved from: or
14. Drysdale, P., and Garnaut, R. (1982). Trade intensities and the analysis of bilateral trade flows in a manycountry world: A survey. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, February(22), 62-84.
15. Facchini, G., Silva, P. and Willmann, G. (2012). The Customs Union issue: Why do we observe so few of them?.CEPR Discussion Paper no. 9135. London, Centre for Economic Policy Research. pubs/dps/DP9135.asp.
16. Helmers, C., and Pasteels, J.(2006).Assessing the Bilateral Trade Potential at the Commodity Level: An Operational Approach. ITC Working Paper, November.
17. International Monetary Fund.(2011). World economic outlook database. Retrieved from
18. International Monetary Fund.(2012). Direction of trade statistics yearbook 2011. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
19. International Monetary Fund.(Various years). International trade statistics yearbook. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
20. Kabir, S., & Salim, R. A. (2011). Parallel integration and ASEAN-EU trade potential: An empirical analysis. Journal of Economic Integration, 26(4), 601-623.
21. Kojima, K. (1964). The patterns of trade among advanced countries. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, June, 16-36.
22. Krugman, Paul. (1990). Is Bilateralism Bad? In International Trade and Policy, ed. Elhanan Helpman and Assaf Razin. Cambridge, MA: MITPress.
23. Linnemann, H. (1966). An econometric study of international trade flows. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland.
24. Meade, James. (1955). The Theory of Customs Unions. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
25. Mukherji, I. N. (2005). The Bangkok agreement: A negative list approach to trade liberalisation in Asia and the Pacific. Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Review, 1(2)
26. Mukherji, I. N. (2007). Asia-Pacific trade agreement: Implications of exchange of trade preferences for member and prospective member countries (Research Document). UNESCAP. Retrieved from tid/apta/tradepref_muk.pdf
27. New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.(2012). ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement. Retrieved from
28. New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.(2012). Trade and economic relations. Retrieved from
29. Pant, B. and Panta, R. K. (2009). Export diversification and Competitiveness: Nepal’s Experience. Economic Review: Occasional Paper, No. 21, 52-78
30. Pastore, F., Ferragina, A. M., & Giovannetti, G. (2009). A tale of parallel integration processes: A gravity analysis of EU trade with Mediterranean and central and eastern European countries. Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, 5(2).
31. Paswan, N. K. (2003). Complementarity and trade potential in India’s trade in agricultural food products Agricultural trade in South Asia: Potential and policy options (pp. 255-344). New Delhi, India: APH Publishing Corporation.
32. Sharma, S., and Chua, S. (2000). ASEAN: Economic integration and intra-regional trade. Applied Economics Letters, 7(3), 165-169.
33. Statistics New Zealand. (Various years). New Zealand external trade statistics. Sudsawasd, S., and Mongsawad, P. (2007). Go with the Gang, ASEAN! ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 24 (3), 339-356.
34. UN COMTRADE. (2012). United Nations Commodity Trade database. Retrieved from db/default.aspx
35. UNCTAD. (2012). UNCTAD Statistical Database. Retrieved from:
36. Viner, Jacob and Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Division of International Law. (1950). The customs union issue. New York: The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
37. Wadhva, C. D., and Ahser, M. G. (1985). ASEAN-South Asia economic relations. Singapore: Institute of South Asian Studies.
38. World Bank. (2008). Methodology: Various Trade Indices. Retrieved from EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/EASTASIAPACIFICEXT/EXTEAPREGTOPINTECOTRA/0,,menuPK:580028~ pagePK:51065911~piPK:64171011~theSitePK:580005,00.html
39. WTO. (2012). International trade and tariff data. Retrieved from
PDF Links  PDF Links
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Editorial Office
Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, 209, Neungdong-Ro, Gwangjin-Gu,
Seoul, 05006, Korea
TEL : +82-2-3408-3338    FAX : +82-2-6935-2492   E-mail :,
Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers |  About
Copyright© by Center for Economic Integration.      Developed in M2PI