Register  |  Login  |  Inquiries  |  Sitemap
Advanced Search
Journal of Economic Integration 2014 March;29(1) :188-209.
Currency Integration under Labor Mobility : when Cost is incurred
Taiyo Yoshimi 
Nanzan University, Aichi, Japan
Corresponding Author: Taiyo Yoshimi ,Tel: +81 528323111, Fax: +81 528351444, Email:
Copyright ©2014 Journal of Economic Integration
We assess whether renouncing monetary policy autonomy becomes a cost of currency integration under labor mobility in the framework of the New Open Economy Macroeconomics. Assuming Nash equilibrium among central banks of candidate countries, we find that the forfeiture of monetary policy autonomy becomes a cost when country-specific total factor productivity shocks hit them, labor input weights differ between candidate countries, and country specific shocks on marginal disutility of labor occur. These finer points suggest that it cannot generally be concluded that there is no cost of currency integration under labor mobility, as discussed in the classic Optimum Currency Area theory.

JEL Classification
F30: General
F33: International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions
F41: Open Economy Macroeconomics
Keywords: New Open Economy Macroeconomic (NOEM) Model | Currency Integration | Labor Mobility | Exchange Rate Regime
1. Bayoumi, T. (1994) “A formal model of optimum currency areas,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol.41, No.4.
2. Bayoumi, T., and Eichengreen, B. (1993) “Shocking aspects of European monetary integration,” In: Adjustment and Growth in the European Monetary Union, ed. by F. Torres, and F. Giavazzi, Cambridge University Press.
3. Bertola, G. (1992) “Models of economic integration and localized growth,” CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 651.
4. Bruno, M. and Sachs, J. D. (1985) Economics of Worldwide Stagflation, Harvard University Press.
5. Calmfors, L. and Driffill, J. (1988) “Bargaining structure, corporatism and macroeconomic performance,”Economic Policy, 3(6), 13-61.
6. Campolmi, A. and Faia, E. (2006) “Cyclical inflation divergence and different labor market institutions in the EMU,” ECB Working Paper Series, No. 619.
7. Cecchetti, S. G. (1999) “Legal structure, financial structure, and the monetary policy transmission mechanism,”NBER Working Paper Series, No. 7151.
8. Chow, H. K. and Kim, Y. (2003) “A common currency peg in East Asia? Perspectives from Western Europe,”Journal of Macroeconomics, 25(3), 331-350.
9. Corden, W. M. (1972) “Monetary integration,” Essays in International Finance, No.93, Princeton University.
10. Corsetti, G. (2008) “A modern reconsideration of the theory of optimal currency areas,” CEPR Discussion Papers, No. 6712.
11. Corsetti, G. and Pesenti, P. (2005) “International dimensions of optimal monetary policy,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(2), 281-305.
12. De Grauwe, P. (2012) Economics of Monetary Union 9th Edition, Oxford University Press.
13. Dellas, H. and Tavlas, G. (2005) “Wage rigidity and monetary union,” Economic Journal, 115, 907-927.
14. Dornbusch, R., Favero, C. A. and Giavazzi, F. (1998) “Immediate challenges for the European Central Bank,”Economic Policy, 26, 15-64.
15. Erceg, C. J., Henderson D. W. and Levin, A. T. (2000) “Optimal monetary policy with staggered wage and price contracts,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 46, 281-313.
16. Fidrmuc, J. and Korhonen, I. (2003) “Similarity of supply and demand shocks between the euro area and the CEECs,” Economic Systems, 27, 313-334.
17. Frenkel, M. and Nickel, C. (2005) “New European Union members on their way to adopting the Euro: an analysis of macroeconomic disturbances,” Global Finance Journal, 15, 303-320.
18. Gáková, Z. and Dijkstra, L. (2008) “Labour mobility between the regions of the EU-27 and a comparison with the USA,” Regional Focus, No.02/2008, European Union.
19. Giersch, H. (1973) “On the desirable degree of flexibility of exchange rates,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 109, 191-213.
20. Horvath, J. and Rátfai, A. (2004) “Supply and demand shocks in accession countries to the Economic and Monetary Union,” Journal of Comparative Economics, 32, 202-211.
21. Kenen, R. (1969) “The theory of optimum currency areas: an eclectic view,” In: Monetary Problems of the International Economy, ed. by R. Mundell and A. Swoboda, University of Chicago Press.
22. Kim, Y. and Chow, H. K. (2003) “Optimum currency area in Europe: an alternative assessment,” Economic Letters, 81, 297-304.
23. Kollmann, R. (2004) “Welfare effects of a monetary union: the role of trade openness,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 289-301.
24. Maclennan, D., Muellbauer, J. and Stephens, M. (1999) “Asymmetries in housing and financial market institutions and EMU,” CEPR Discussion Papers, No. 2062.
25. McKinnon, R. I. (1963) “Optimum Currency Areas,” The American Economic Review, 53, 717-725.
26. Mundell, R. A. (1961) “The theory of optimum currency areas,” The American Economic Review, 51, 657-665.
27. Mojon, B. (2000) “Financial structure and the interest rate channel of ECB monetary policy,” ECB Working Paper Series, No. 40.
28. Obstfeld, M. and Rogoff, K. (2000) “New directions for stochastic open economy models,” Journal of International Economics, 50, 117-153.
29. Peersman, G. and Smets, F. (2001) “The monetary transmission mechanism in the euro area: more evidence from VAR analysis,” ECB Working Paper Series, No. 91.
30. Ricci, L. A. (2008) “A model of an optimum currency area,” Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 2, 1-31.
31. Zhang, Z., Sato, K. and McAleer, M. (2004) “Asian monetary integration: a structural VAR approach,”Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 64, 447-458.
32. Zimmermann, K. F. (2009) “Labor mobility and the integration of European labor markets,” IZA Discussion Paper Series, No. 3999.
Editorial Office
Center for Economic Integration, Sejong Institution, Sejong University, 209, Neungdong-Ro, Gwangjin-Gu,
Seoul, 05006, Korea
TEL : +82-2-3408-3338    FAX : +82-2-3408-3338   E-mail :
Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers |  About
Copyright© by Center for Economic Integration. All right reserved.